Peer-reviewed study shows tailpipe-only standards can result in unintended consequences
Southfield, MI /PRNewswire/ - The Steel Recycling Institute (SRI), a business unit of the American Iron and Steel Institute, today released a peer-reviewed study demonstrating the importance of material production emissions toward a vehicle's lifetime environmental impact. The study, "Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas and Energy Study of Automotive Lightweighting," examines the overall environmental impact of vehicle lightweighting using advanced high-strength steel (AHSS) compared with aluminum. It concludes AHSS-intensive vehicles had lower or equivalent life cycle emissions than aluminum-intensive vehicles for every class of vehicles tested – sedans, trucks, SUVs and alternative power train vehicles. The study was independently reviewed by expert representatives from Harvard, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Argonne National Lab, and thinkstep to establish conformance with International Organization for Standardization (ISO), the globally recognized benchmark for standard setting.
The study demonstrates focusing only on tailpipe emissions will likely produce unintended consequences of higher total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to the atmosphere when considering lightweighting of vehicle body and closures. This increase is a result of the significant differences in emissions between AHSS and aluminum in the production phase of the materials. The increased production emissions for aluminum can outweigh emission reductions in both the driving and recycling phases.
"As driving emissions decrease to meet regulations, production emissions become an even more significant component of a vehicle's full environmental footprint," said Jody Hall, vice president, automotive market, SMDI. "If material production phase emissions continue to be overlooked, negative effects on the environment will begin before the vehicle is ever driven. Steel offers the best solution for the environment, the best performance and cost effective solution for automakers, and ultimately the best value for consumers."
Key findings of the study include:
The peer reviewed, publicly available University of California Santa Barbara Automotive Materials Comparison Model (UCSB Model v5) was used in this study to assess average 2016 model year vehicles in several size ranges and with different powertrain systems, including a mid-size sedan, SUV, truck, mid-size hybrid and compact battery electric car. In 2016 SMDI released a white paper on life cycle GHG emissions; this study includes a comprehensive ISO-conformant peer review of that white paper and incorporates updated baseline vehicle models and data.
The baseline vehicles were each redesigned with AHSS-intensive and aluminum-intensive bodies to reduce the overall weight of the vehicle. The life cycle GHG emissions of the redesigned vehicles were then compared. More specifics on the methodology are in the studies here.
AISI serves as the voice of the North American steel industry in the public policy arena and advances the case for steel in the marketplace as the preferred material of choice. AISI also plays a lead role in the development and application of new steels and steelmaking technology. AISI is comprised of 20 member companies, including integrated and electric furnace steelmakers, and approximately 120 associate members who are suppliers to or customers of the steel industry.
Steel Market Development Institute, a business unit of AISI increases and defends the use of steel by developing innovative materials, applications and value-added solutions for customers in the automotive, construction and packaging markets. SMDI automotive investors include: AK Steel Corporation, ArcelorMittal and Nucor Corporation. For more information, visit www.autosteel.org or follow @SMDISteel on Twitter.
SOURCE: Steel Market Development InstituteCopyright 2018 PR Newswire. All Rights Reserved